Fast ForWord History

Scientific Learning was founded on the belief that all students deserve to reach their maximum reading potential.

Exp
0
YEARS
SCHOOLS
0 K
JOINED
STUDENTS
0 M+
ENROLLED

The Founders

Dr. Michael M. Merzenich

Dr. Paula A. Tallal

Dr. William M. Jenkins

Dr. Steven L. Miller

Four dedicated individuals.
One important mission.

The story of Scientific Learning begins with four research scientists: Michael Merzenich, William Jenkins, Paula Tallal, and Steven Miller.

When the work of these four scientists intersected, their collaboration proved that the underlying cognitive processes that influence speech and language problems could be identified—and permanently improved.

These findings led to the development of the Fast ForWord program, a groundbreaking computer-based reading intervention. The scientists then founded Scientific Learning to bring their program out of the lab and into the lives of struggling readers.

The Changing Brain

As a student at the University of Portland in the early 1960s, Michael Merzenich discovered an interest in science that led him to the field of neuroscience.

He earned his Ph.D. in neurophysiology at Johns Hopkins and went on to the University of California at San Francisco, where he pursued his interest in how the brain processes information.

Among his achievements: developing the cochlear implant, which electrically translates acoustic signals into the nerves used for hearing.

During the 1970s and 1980s, Merzenich and his colleagues at the University of California, San Francisco, ran a series of experiments designed to illuminate how the brain interpreted stimuli. They discovered that the brain actually changed physiologically when it learned or experienced something new.

More significantly, collaborative experiments by Merzenich and William Jenkins, Ph.D.—who joined the UCSF lab in 1980—showed the adult brain also demonstrated change and adaptation in response to behavioral stimuli.

“We established that the brain is modified on a substantial scale, both physically and functionally, each time we learn a new skill or develop a new ability,” said Merzenich. “Our brains were created to reinvent and reconfigure themselves throughout our lifetimes.” This ability is known as brain plasticity.

Another exciting discovery emerged when Jenkins spearheaded a study that showed progressive training could actually accelerate the rate at which the brain changed.

A Meeting of Minds

The Santa Fe Institute is a think tank devoted to fostering multidisciplinary collaboration between scientists who might not otherwise work together. In 1993 the institute held a conference at which Merzenich, Tallal, and Steven Miller—who was working with Tallal as a post-doctoral graduate student—were invited to present their research.

When she and Merzenich heard each other speak, says Tallal, it all fell into place. “It really clicked that we should work together,” she says.

Merzenich saw the possibilities, too. “Bill Jenkins and I had discussed using our training tools, as applied in monkeys, for impaired human populations, and we both realized that Paula’s kind of kid problem might be addressed with our kind of solution,” says Merzenich.

The four scientists obtained research funding to develop model training tools. Jenkins took the lead on creating the computer software that would be the foundation of the training components.

Jenkins and his team developed complex algorithms that could stretch the speed and enhance the components of speech, but the challenge was how to package the software so it would engage children.

The solution? Make a game of it.

The software component used to train the brain to increase its sampling-rate characteristics was disguised as something called Circus Sequence, while another component became Old McDonald’s Flying Farm.

Within six months, Jenkins, Merzenich, and their colleagues had a prototype product ready to go.

Taking the Next Step

The study results were published in the journal Science in the summer of 1995, and were presented at a conference in November, which sparked an article in the New York Times. The public response was immediate and overwhelming.

“Something like 20,000 people tried to call Rutgers to get information, but we don’t know exactly how many because the phone banks blew up,” says Miller. “In the end, we took about 17,000 calls, and CNN covered it.”

Soon, Rutgers and UCSF, who jointly owned the technology and the ideas behind it, looked into licensing it for commercial use, but the quality of the licensing applicants was underwhelming.

“My view was, the companies and the kinds of software that were out there would not leverage the science correctly,” says Jenkins. “I saw a lot of edutainment software out there purporting to provide educational benefit, but the designs weren’t neuroscience-based. The science was so important and the potential was so big, it didn’t make sense to risk it not being done well.”

In early 1996, Merzenich, Tallal, Jenkins, and Miller formed Scientific Learning Corporation. The company began offering the Fast ForWord program to speech language professionals and school districts across North America, and expanded over time to more than 40 countries worldwide.

Today Scientific Learning continues to create educational software that accelerates learning by improving the processing efficiency of the brain.

The Fast ForWord® family of products provides struggling readers with computer-delivered exercises that build the cognitive skills required to read and learn effectively.

Scientific Learning Reading Assistant Plus™ is the only reading solution to combine advanced speech recognition technology with scientifically-based courseware to help students strengthen fluency, vocabulary and comprehension to become proficient, life-long readers.

Research

The Scientific Learning suite of programs implements neuroscience-based learning principles derived from decades of scientific research.

Ahissar, M. (2001). Perceptual training: A tool for both modifying the brain and exploring it. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 98(21), 11842-3.

Ahissar, M., Protopapas, A., Reid, M., & Merzenich, M.M. (2000). Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 6832-6837.

Alexander, D. W., & Frost, B. P. (1982). Decelerated synthesized speech as a means of shaping speed of auditory processing of children with delayed language. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 55(3, Pt 1), 783-792.

Bao, S., Chan, V.T., Zhang, L. I., & Merzenich, M. M.(2003). Suppression of cortical representation through backward conditioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S, 100(3), 1405-8.

Bao, S., Chang, E. F., Davis, J. D., Gobeske, K. T., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003). Progressive degradation and subsequent refinement of acoustic representations in the adult auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(34), 10765-75.

Beitel, R.E., Schreiner, C. E., Cheung, S. W., Wang, X., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003). Reward-dependent plasticity in the primary auditory cortex of adult monkeys trained to discriminate temporally modulated signals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 100(19), 11070-5.

Benasich, A. A., & Tallal, P. (1996). Auditory temporal processing thresholds, habituation, and recognition memory over the 1st year. Infant Behavior & Development, 19(3), 339-357.

Benasich, A. A., & Tallal, P. (2002). Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment. Behavior and Brain Research, 136(1), 31-49.

Benasich, A. A., Curtiss, S., & Tallal, P. (1993). Language, learning, and behavioral disturbances in childhood: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(3), 585-594.

Bishop, D. V. M., Bishop, S. J., Bright, P., James, C., Delaney, T., & Tallal, P. (1999). Different origin of auditory and phonological processing problems in children with language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 42(1), 155-168.

Blake, D. T., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Changes of AI receptive fields with sound density.Journal of Neurophysiology, 88(6), 3409-20.

Blake, D. T., Strata, F., Churchland, A. K., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Neural correlates of instrumental learning in primary auditory cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 99(15), 10114-9.

Boets, B., Vandermosten, M., Poelmans, H., Luts, H., Wouters, J., & Ghesquiere, P. (2011). Preschool impairments in auditory processing and speech perception uniquely predict future reading problems. Research in Developmental Disabilities 32: 560-570.

Burns, M. (2003). Fast ForWord Products Open a Child’s Window to Language. Autism Asperger’s Digest. April-March, 2003. (Condensed version available here.)

Burns, M. S. (1999). Access to reading: The language to literacy link. Paper presented at the Learning Disabilities Association Conference.

Burns, M. S. Incorporating Fast ForWord Reading into a speech and language practice (pp. 1-3). Scientific Learning Corporation.

Chang, E. F., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003). Environmental noise retards auditory cortical development. Science, 300(5618), 498-502.

De Martino, S., Espesser, R., Rey, V., & Habib, M. (2001). The “temporal processing deficit” hypothesis in dyslexia: New experimental evidence. Brain & Cognition, 46(1-2), 104-108.

Denenberg, V. H. (1999). A critique of Mody, Studdert-Kennedy, and Brady’s “Speech perception deficits in poor readers: Auditory processing or phonological coding?”. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(5), 379-383.

Eimas, P. D., Miller, J. L., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1987). On infant speech perception and the acquisition of language. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. (pp. 161-195). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Elliott, L. L., & Hammer, M. A. (1988). Longitudinal changes in auditory discrimination in normal children and children with language-learning problems. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 53(4), 467-474.

Farmer, M. E., & Klein, R. (1993). Auditory and visual temporal processing in dyslexic and normal readers. In P. Tallal, A. M. Galaburda, R. R. Llinás, & C. von Euler.(Eds.), Temporal information processing in the nervous system: Special reference to dyslexia and dysphasia(pp. 339-341). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

Fellbaum, C., Miller, S., Curtiss, S., & Tallal, P. (1995). An auditory processing deficit as a possible source of SLI. In D. McLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 204-215). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Fiez, J. A., Raichle, M. E., Balota, D. A., Tallal, P., & Petersen, S. E. (1996). PET activation of posterior temporal regions during auditory word presentation and verb generation. Cerebral Cortex, 6(1), 1-10.

Fiez, J. A., Raichle, M. E., Miezin, J. D. E., Petersen, S. E., Tallal, P., & Katz, W. F. (1996). PET studies of auditory and phonological processing: Effects of stimulus characteristics and task demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 357-375.

Flax, J.F., Realpe-Bonilla, T., Hirsch, L., Brzustowicz, L.M., Bartlett, C.W., & Tallal, P. (2003). Specific language impairment in families: Evidence for co-occurrence with reading impairments. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 530-543.

Frumkin, B., & Rapin, I. (1980). Perception of vowels and consonant-vowels of varying duration in language impaired children. Neuropsychologia, 18(4-sup-5), 443-454.

Garabedian, C. E., Jones, S. R., Merzenich, M. M., Dale, A., & Moore, C. I. (2003). Band-pass response properties of rat SI neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(3), 1379-91.

Gillam, R. B. (1999). Treatment for temporal processing deficits: Computer-assisted language intervention using Fast ForWord(R): Theoretical and empirical considerations for clinical decision-making. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools. 30(4), 363-370.

Habib, M. (2000). The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: An overview and working hypothesis. Brain, 123(12), 2373-2399.

Habib, M., Espesser, R., Rey, V., Giraud, K., Bruas, P., & Gres, C. (1999). Training dyslexics with acoustically modified speech: Evidence of improved phonological performance. Brain & Cognition, 40(1), 143-146.

Habib, M., Rey, V., Daffaure, V., Camps, R., Espesser, R., Joly-Pottuz, B., & Demonet, J.-F. (2002). Phonological training in children with dyslexia using temporally modified speech: A three-step pilot investigation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37(3), 289-308.

Hari, R., & Kiesila, P. (1996). Deficit of temporal auditory processing in dyslexic adults.Neuroscience Letters, 205(2), 138-40.

Hickmott, P. W. & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Local circuit properties underlying cortical reorganization. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88(3), 1288-301.

Houde, J. F., Nagarajan, S. S., Sekihara, K., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1125-38.

Jenkins, W. M., Merzenich, M. M., & Recanzone, G. (1990). Neocortical representational dynamics in adult primates: Implications for neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia, 28(6), 573-84.

Kilgard, M. P. & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Order-sensitive plasticity in adult primary auditory cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 99(5), 3205-9.

Kilgard, M. P., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998). Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity [see comments]. Science, 279(5357), 1714-8.

Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carrell, T. D., King, C., & et al. (1995). Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1), 25-32.

Lakshminarayanan, K. & Tallal, P (2007). Generalization of non-linguistic auditory perceptual training to syllable discrimination. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25, 263-272.

Leonard, L. (1997). Children with specific language impairments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lincoln, A. J., Dickstein, P., Courchesne, E., Elmasian, R., & Tallal, P. (1992). Auditory processing abilities in non-retarded adolescents and young adults with developmental receptive language disorder and autism. Brain & Language, 43(4), 613-622.

Linden, J. F., Liu, R.C., Sahani, M., Schreiner, C. E., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003). Spectrotemporal structure of receptive fields in areas AI and AAF of mouse auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(4), 2660-75.

Liu, R.C., Miller, K. D., Merzenich, M. M., & Schreiner, C. E. (2003). Acoustic variability and distinguishability among mouse ultrasound vocalizations. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 114(6 Pt 1), 3412-22.

McCandliss, B.D., Fiez, J.A., Protopapas, A, Conway, M, & McClelland, J.L. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(2), 89-108.

McClelland, J. L., Thomas, A.G., McCandliss, B. D., & Fiez, J. A. (1999). Understanding failures of learning: Hebbian learning, competition for representational space, and some preliminary experimental data. In J. A. Reggia & D. Glanzman (Eds.), Progress in brain research, volume 121, disorders of brain, behavior and cognition: The neurocomputational perspective (pp. 75-80). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

McKenzie, A. L., Nagarajan, S. S., Roberts, T. P., Merzenich, M. M., & Byl, N. N. (2003). Somatosensory representation of the digits and clinical performance in patients with focal hand dystonia. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(10), 737-49.

Merzenich, M. M. & Jenkins, W. M (1995). Cortical plasticity, learning, and learning dysfunction. In B. Julesz & I. Kovacs, Maturational windows and adult cortical plasticity (pp. 247-272). Santa Fe, NM: Addison-Wesley.

Merzenich, M. M., & DeCharms, R. C. (1996). Neural representations, experience and change. In R. Llinas & P. Churchland (Eds.), The mind-brain continuum (pp. 61-81). Boston: MIT Press.

Merzenich, M. M., & Jenkins, W. M. (1994). Cortical representation of learned behaviors. In P. Anderson, O. Hvalby, O. Paulsen & B. Hokfelt (Eds.), Memory concepts (pp. 437-453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Scientific Learning Corporation. (2009). Reading Verification Improvements in Scientific Learning Reading Assistant™ Expanded Edition, Scientific Learning: Research Reports, 13(13): 1-18.

Scientific Learning Corporation. (2009). The Science behind Scientific Learning’s Product Placement Recommendations, Scientific Learning: Research Reports, 13(15): 1-10.

Scientific Learning Corporation. (2010). The California Standards Test. Scientific Learning: Research Reports, 14(3): 1-15.

Scientific Learning Corporation. (2012). Adding ten minutes of reading time dramatically changes levels of print exposure. Oakland, CA: Scientific Learning Corporation.

Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Stark, R. E., & Tallal, P. (1979). Analysis of stop consonant production errors in developmentally dysphasic children. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 66(6), 1703-12.

Stark, R. E., & Tallal, P. (1981). Selection of children with specific language deficits. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 46(2), 114-122.periodical

Stark, R., & Tallal, P. (1988). Language, speech and reading disorders in children: Neuropsychological studies. Boston: College-Hill Press.

Studdert-Kennedy, M., Mody, M., & Brady, S. (2000). Speech perception deficits in poor readers: A reply to Denenberg’s critique. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 317-321.

Talcott, J. B., & Witton, C. (2002). A sensory-linguistic approach to normal and impaired reading development. In E. Witruk, A. D. Friederici, & et. al. (Eds.), Basic functions of language, reading and reading disability (pp. 213-240). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Talcott, J. B., Witton, C., McClean, M., Hansen, P. C., Rees, A., Green, G. G. R., & Stein, J. F. (1999). Can sensitivity to auditory frequency modulation predict children’s phonological and reading skills? Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 10(10), 2045-2050.

Talcott, J. B., Witton, C., McLean, M. F., Hansen, P. C., Rees, A., Green, G. G., & Stein, J. F. (2000). Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children’s word decoding skills. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 97(6), 2952-7.

Tallal, P. (1975). Perceptual and linguistic factors in the language impairment of developmental dysphasics: An experimental investigation with the Token Test. Cortex, 11(3), 196-205.

Tallal, P. (1976). Rapid auditory processing in normal and disordered language development. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 19(3), 561-571.

Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9(2), 182-198.

Tallal, P. (1980). Language and reading: Some perceptual prerequisites. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 170-178.

Tallal, P. (1980). Language disabilities in children: A perceptual or linguistic deficit? Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 5(2), 127-140.

Tallal, P. (1980). Perceptual requisites for language. In R. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Non-speech language and communication (pp. 449-467). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

Tallal, P. (1987). Developmental dysphasia. In G. Adelman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (Vol. 1, pp. 351-353). Boston: Birkhauser.

Tallal, P. (1999). Moving research from the laboratory to clinics and classrooms. In D. Drake (Ed.), Reading and attention disorders: Neurobiological correlates (pp. 93-112). Baltimore, MD: York Press.

Tallal, P. (2000). Experimental studies of language learning impairments: From research to remediation. In D.M.V. Bishop & L. B. Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 131-155). Hove, AK: Psychology Press.

Tallal, P. (2000). The science of literacy: From the laboratory to the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 97(6), 2402-4.

Tallal, P. (2003). Language learning disabilities: Integrating research approaches. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(6), 206-211.

Tallal, P. & Miller, S.L. (2003). How the brain learns to read. Middle Matters, 12(1), 7.

Tallal, P., & Benasich, A. A. (2002). Developmental language learning impairments.Developmental Psychopathology, 14(3), 559-79.

Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1975). Developmental aphasia: The perception of brief vowels and extended stop consonants. Neuropsychologia, 13, 69-74.

Tallal, P., & Stark, R. E. (1981). Speech acoustic-cue discrimination abilities of normally developing and language-impaired children. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 69, 568-574.

Tallal, P., Allard, L., Miller, S., & Curtiss, S. (1997). Academic outcomes of language impaired children. In C. Hulne & M. Snowling (Eds.), Dyslexia; Biology, cognition and intervention (pp 167-181). London: Whurr Press.

Tallal, P., Dukette, D., & Curtiss, S. (1989). Behavioral/emotional profiles of preschool language-impaired children. Development and Psychopathology, 1, 51-67.

Tallal, P., Galaburda, A. M., Llinas, R. R., & von Euler, C. (Eds.). (1993). Temporal information processing in the nervous system: Special reference to dyslexia and dysphasia. (Vol. 682). NY: New York Academy of Sciences.

Tallal, P., M. Merzenich, et al. (1998). Language learning impairment: Integrating research and remediation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 197-9.

Tallal, P., Miller, S., & Fitch, R. H. (1993). Neurobiological basis of speech: A case for the preeminence of temporal processing. Ann NY Acad Sci, 682, 27-47.

Tallal, P., Miller, S., & Fitch, R. H. (1995). Neurobiological basis of speech: A case for the preeminence of temporal processing. Irish Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 194-219.

Tallal, P., Sainburg, R. L., & Jernigan, T. (1991). The neuropathology of developmental dysphasia: Behavioral, morphological, and physiological evidence for a pervasive temporal processing disorder. Reading & Writing, 3(3-4), 363-377.

Tallal, P., Stark, R. E., Kallman, C., & Mellits, D. (1980). Developmental dysphasia: Relation between acoustic processing deficits and verbal processing. Neuropsychologia, 18(3), 273-284.

Tallal, P., Stark, R. E., Kallman, C., & Mellits, D. (1980). Perceptual constancy for phonemic categories: A developmental study with normal and language impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1(1), 49-64.

Tallal, P., Stark, R., Kallman, C., & Mellits, D. (1981). A reexamination of some nonverbal perceptual abilities of language-impaired and normal children as a function of age and sensory modality. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 24(3), 351-357.

Temple, E., Poldrack, R. A., Salidis, J., Deutsch, G. K., Tallal, P., Merzenich, M. M., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2001). Disrupted neural responses to phonological and orthographic processing in dyslexic children: An fMRI study. Neuroreport, 12(2), 299-307.

Thibodeau, L. M., & Sussman, H. M. (1979). Performance on a test of categorical perception of speech in normal and communication disordered children. Journal of Phonetics, 7(4), 375-391.

Veale, T. K. (1999). Targeting temporal processing deficits through Fast ForWord(R): Language therapy with a new twist. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 30(4), 353-362.

Wang, X., Merzenich, M.M., Sameshima, K., & Jenkins, W.M. (1995). Remodeling of hand representation in adult cortex determined by timing of tactile stimulation. Nature, 378, 71-75.

Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1987). Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41(1), 48-61.

Witton, C., Stein, J. F., Stoodley, C. J., Rosner, B. S., & Talcott, J. B. (2002). Separate influences of acoustic AM and FM sensitivity on the phonological decoding skills of impaired and normal readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 866-874.

Wright, B. A., Buonomano, D. V., Mahncke, H. W., & Merzenich, M. M. (1997). Learning and generalization of auditory temporal-interval discrimination in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(10), 3956-63.

Wright, B.A., Lombardino, L.J., King, W.M., Puranik, C.S., Leonard, C.M., & Merzenich, M.M. (1997). Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature, 387(6629), 176-178.

Young, M. L. Recognizing and treating children with central auditory processing disorders (pp. 1-12). Scientific Learning Corporation.

Zhang, L. I., Bao, S., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Disruption of primary auditory cortex by synchronous auditory inputs during a critical period. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 99(4), 2309-14.

Zhang, L. I., Tan, A. Y., Schreiner, C. E., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003). Topography and synaptic shaping of direction selectivity in primary auditory cortex. Nature, 424(6945), 201-5.

Fast ForWord is the only reading intervention backed by 30+ years of neuroscience research that has been and continues to be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Scientific Learning Corporation (2021). Research Behind the Fast ForWord Reading Comprehension Component. 

Iowa and Nevada Departments of Education (2017). Departments of Education Name Fast ForWord Top Intervention.

Rogowsky, B. (2010). The Impact of Fast ForWord® on Sixth Grade Students’ Use of Standard Edited American English. Doctor of Education dissertation, Wilkes University.

Russo, N.M., Hornickel, H., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., Kraus, N. (2010)  Biological changes in auditory function following training in children with autism spectrum disordersBehavioral and Brain Functions 6(60), 1-8.

Stevens, C., Fanning, J., Coch, D., Sanders, L., & H Neville (2008). Neural mechanisms of selective auditory attention are enhanced by computerized training: Electrophysiological evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Brain Research, 1205, 55-69.

Temple, E., Deutsch, G. K., Poldrack, R. A., Miller, S.L., Tallal, P., Merzenich, M. M., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRIProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(5), 2860-2865.

Ylinen, S. & Kujala, T. (2015). Neuroscience illuminating the influence of auditory or phonological intervention on language-related deficits.  Frontiers in Psychology, 6.